Title

The process of sulfide oxidation in some acid sulfate soil materials

Document Type

Article

Publication details

Ward, NJ, Sullivan, LA, Fyfe, DM, Bush, RT & Ferguson, AJP 2004, ‘The process of sulfide oxidation in some acid sulfate soil materials', Australian Journal of Soil Research, vol. 42, no. 4, pp. 449-458.

Published version available from:

http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/SR03135

Peer Reviewed

Peer-Reviewed

Abstract

The process of sulfide oxidation in acid sulfate soils (ASS) is complex, involving the formation of numerous oxidation products. In this study the sulfide oxidation process was examined in 2 ASS materials over a period of 36 days using laboratory incubation experiments. Both ASS materials experienced substantial sulfide oxidation and acidification during incubation. The oxidation of pyrite was the primary cause of acidification in these ASS materials. Although a decrease in magnetic susceptibility (χ) over the initial 4 days of incubation suggested the rapid oxidation of ferromagnetic iron monosulfide greigite (Fe3S4), the total acid volatile sulfur (SAV) fraction increased in concentration by an order of magnitude over the initial 8 days of incubation. Oxygen (O2) concentration profiles indicated the presence of anoxic conditions in the centre of the incubating materials even after 16 days of exposure to the atmosphere enabling SAV formation to occur. The oxidation of the SAV fraction did not result in substantial acidification. A large proportion of the water-soluble iron released by sulfide oxidation was precipitated as iron oxides and hydroxides. Sulfate (SO42-) was the dominant sulfur species produced from sulfide oxidation in both ASS materials, although water-soluble SO42- was a poor indicator of the extent of sulfide oxidation. The sulfoxyanion intermediates, thiosulfate (S2O32-) and tetrathionate (S4O62-), were detected only in the early stages of incubation, with minimal amounts being detected after the initial 4 days. The relative abundance of these 2 intermediate sulfur species appeared to be dependent on the soil pH, with S4O62- dominating S2O32- in the more acidic ASS material (i.e. pH 3+) and bacterial catalysis were driving the oxidation processes. While these sulfoxyanion intermediates only constituted a small percentage of the reduced inorganic sulfur (RIS) fraction, they accounted for up to 9.3% of the total soluble sulfur fraction. Elemental sulfur (S0) was not an important sulfide oxidation product in the ASS materials examined in this study.