Title

Nitrogen and phosphorus budgets for the sub-tropical Richmond River catchment, Australia

Document Type

Article

Publication details

McKee, LJ & Eyre, BD 2000, 'Nitrogen and phosphorus budgets for the sub-tropical Richmond River catchment, Australia', Biogeochemistry, vol. 50, no. 3, pp. 207-239.

The original publication is available at www.springerlink.com, http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1006391927371

Abstract

Nitrogen and phosphorus budgets were developed for four sub-catchments in the Richmond River catchment for two study years. The catchment is used for a variety of farming pursuits including dairying, beef,cropping, fruit, nuts, forestry, and sugar cane. Each sub-catchment varies in hydrology, the proportion ofeach land use, and the population density which enabled a unique opportunity to study fluxes and storage associated with a variety of environmental factors. Total loadings entering each sub-catchment varied from 12 to 57 kg ha–1yr–1 for nitrogen and 0.25 to 6.6 kg ha–1yr–1 for phosphorus with little inter-annual variation. Averaged across the whole catchment, nitrogen fixation (47%) dominated the inputs; fertiliser (26%) and rainfall (21%) made up the next largest inputs. Fertiliser inputs dominated the phosphorus budget(65.5%); rainfall and manures making up 13% and 12%respectively. Produce dominated the outputs of both nitrogen and phosphorus from the four sub-catchments being greater than the riverine export. The delivery of nitrogen to catchment streams ranged from <1>to24% of the total inputs and the delivery of phosphorus to catchment streams ranged from <1 to>39%. Storage of phosphorus in catchment soils varied between –0.32 and 4.46 kg ha–1yr–1. When denitrification and volatilisation were estimated using data from other studies, storage of nitrogen ranged from 1 to 24 kg ha–1yr–1. Despite the episodic nature of run off in the sub-tropical Richmond River catchment, the magnitude of nutrient fluxes and storage appear similar to other catchments of the world which have mixed land use and relatively low catchment nutrient loadings.

Find in your library

Share

COinS